Skip to main content
Contact

Security & Compliance

Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Testing

Systematic identification of exploitable weaknesses, followed by controlled attempts to exploit them safely — the difference between an automated scan and a real test of what an attacker could actually do.

VAPT · OWASP-Aligned · CVSS Severity Scoring

What it is

An automated scanner finds known signatures. A VAPT engagement combines that with a human tester who actively tries to exploit what's found, chains weaknesses together the way a real attacker would, and confirms what's actually reachable — not just what's theoretically vulnerable.

How it works

  1. 01
    Scope & threat model

    Define what's in scope, what's explicitly out, and what an attacker would actually be trying to reach — before any testing starts.

  2. 02
    Test execution

    Black, grey, or white-box, matched to what you need to know and how much internal access makes sense to grant for this pass.

  3. 03
    Findings & severity

    Every issue rated by real-world exploitability and impact using CVSS-based scoring, not a blanket label applied without context.

  4. 04
    Remediation & re-test

    Fixing what was found, then confirming the fix actually closes the gap — not just that a patch was deployed.

Benefits

  • A documented, severity-rated finding report, not a generic scanner printout
  • OWASP-aligned methodology and CVSS-based severity scoring
  • Remediation support and a re-test, not a PDF and a goodbye

Frequently asked

How long does a penetration test take?

It depends on scope — defined during the scope call, not before we know what's actually being tested.

Will testing disrupt production?

Scope and timing are agreed upfront specifically to avoid this. Production-safe testing windows are standard practice, not an afterthought.

Also under Security & Compliance

Black-Box Testing

Testing with no internal knowledge of the system — a real external attacker's vantage point.

Grey-Box Testing

Partial system knowledge — the middle ground between an outsider's view and a full code audit.

White-Box Testing

A full walkthrough of the source code and architecture alongside the test.

DPDP Act Compliance Advisory

What your systems actually collect, where consent is properly recorded, and what closing the gap requires.

Security Hardening & Review

Closing the specific gaps a test surfaces — not a generic checklist applied regardless of findings.

Not sure this is the right fit yet?

A scope call is a lower-commitment way to find out before anything gets built.

Start the conversation